Not a member? Sign up
Carbon trading explained through biscuits.
Check out our map of Britain's biggest carbon emitters.
Welcome to this blog on the issue of climate change and the journey to get this website built. We'll be posting updates regularly and we hope soon you'll be able to add comments and contribute.
So much will be written, has already been written, about this historic US election that it seems pointless to add to the cacophony, but there really is nothing else that warrants writing about right now. The EU carbon price may be elegantly swan-diving and the reasons are interesting, but if there is one thing that will positively affect the future of the global carbon market it’s tonight’s result.
If the US elects Obama and we witness the dawn a new era in international relations in the US then the chances of working out a new climate deal are substantially improved. But, as with the last one, with regard to the nature of that deal what the US wants it will almost certainly get – such is the importance that everyone – Europe, China, India, Africa - places on getting them back in the game. Not only because they are such a huge source of emissions but also because the US has such a fantastic track record in incubating and commercialising new technologies.
We had an interesting meeting with steel manufacturers Corus today. They are one of the biggest UK companies participating in the EU trading scheme and appear to have a very comfortable surplus of permits (in the UK at least*) compared to recent emissions levels, even after taking into account the rule changes between 2007 and 2008.
With regard to how to tackle climate change internationally we were actually in agreement – the approach has to be global and, in sectors exposed to international competition , companies need to be treated equitably.
But when it comes to the current phase of trading and the cancelling of permits, to tighten the cap and reduce pollution, views diverged.
>
This week involved a trip to Brussels to take part in a stake holder event focused on the question of what kind of international agreement should follow on from Kyoto.
Part of the day involved an update on the science which was, as ever, quite depressing. Everything is happening faster than the models predicted. As if to confirm this, my inbox this morning contained the headlines – “Arctic temperatures at record levels” - air temperatures this Autumn are 5 degrees C warmer than normal and the Greenland summer melt this year broke records in terms of its extent and duration. And “Sea's Acidity Rising 100 Times Faster Than in Past” - according to a UNESCO report issued yesterday the acidification of the world’s oceans, caused by the absorption of huge volumes of carbon dioxide, is accelerating at an unprecedented rate, threatening marine ecosystems and the livelihoods of tens of millions of people.
All cheery stuff.
Continues....
This week we had some good news – our very first fundraising application was successful. This means we now have the resources to take set up an office. Until now we have been a working from home and in places we like with free wi-fi ( I’d recommend the Regent pub on Liverpool Road) - an arrangement which has worked well but which really isn’t sustainable. So this week we were visiting potential offices and weighing up pros and cons. We could take up residence on ‘Silicon Roundabout’ with some exciting new web start ups, or take advantage of the serviced offices provided by the Ethical Property Company also in Old St. While we make our minds up it’s likely we’ll take up temporary residence at one of the ‘hubs’ in Angel and Kings Cross where there are lots of like-minded organisations. The Kings Cross venue has just opened and is a more social space complete with bar/coffee shop.
On the campaign front I was at a dinner hosted by PR firm Hills and Knowlton this week and was chatting to Dr Stuart Smith, their Head of Corporate Practice, who mentioned that he believed the firm 3M had at some stage adopted a corporate policy not to sell spare emissions permits.
Continues...
An influential Committee of the European Parliament voted today on rule changes in the emissions trading scheme post 2012. Since these rules will dictate how much pollution we are prepared to tolerate for a long time into the future it is important that they are got right.
Overall the outcome from today looks positive. We wrote to Committee Members in advance of the vote about three things:
On the first, though the reduction target was not increased, yet, it remains the case that it will automatically increase (from a 20% to a 30% reduction by 2020) if and when a global deal is reached in the UN international negotiation process. Industry lobbying seeking to weaken this was defeated and also a new requirement that Member States prepare plans and projections for meeting the higher target was introduced.
Continues...
"There's a lot of effort to curb emissions of CO2 but the scale is not big enough. It has to be on a much, much larger scale. The scale of the problem is enormous.'' Corinne Le Quere, British Antarctic Survey and Global Carbon Project.
The team of scientists making up the Global Carbon Project today reported that manmade emissions of carbon dioxide grew 2.5 percent last year and warned that global efforts so far were failing, putting the globe on track for the more pessimistic future scenarios. That could see a temperature increase of as much as 6.3 degrees by 2100, resulting in the melting of Greenland's ice sheet, raising sea levels by about 7 meters.
So sandbags at the ready everyone.
Continues...
From an underground bunker, last inhabited by Sir Winston Churchill and his war time cabinet, we launched sandbag last night. A few technical glitches aside it seemed to go down pretty well. We attempted to show our new film, but sadly the volume gave out half way through, but, via the power of Youtube, we are pleased to say the whole thing can now be viewed on line here.
It's our attempt at explaining emissions trading to the man on the street. Thanks to Greg, Marek and James for putting this together at short notice. Stirling work.
We also made our updated Google map live. Log in to see how emissions from power stations and factories last year compare with the number of permits they have been allocated for this year and the next four years. The data is still not very clean in places sadly as some sites have entered post-codes for administrative head-quarters nowhere near the site itself. We are investigating ways of correcting this but it may prove a task that needs crowd-sourcing. Anyone with any nifty suggestions for how to make this happen, please get in touch.
So with the launch event over, we can now concentrate on getting this campaign underway and also improving the functionality of the website. Thanks to everyone who has registered to date and signed up as members - we will be in touch soon to begin the process of turning ourselves into an irresistible force for change.
Well this is a strange feeling, the articles from tomorrow's Guardian are now on-line and we are in there, so I guess that means the idea is out there. But what will people's reactions be? It was really wierd reading the news piece - this is the first time companies have been contacted and the range of responses is interesting - I like the "magical logic" quote. Corus' explanation of their surplus doesn't hold water at all - the expansion in scope they refer to accounts for roughly 1.1 million extra tonnes across 3 installations whereas their annual surplus is 2.8 million. The response from DEFRA is a bit annoying but predictable. Yes of course there will be differences from year to year but an apparent surplus of 9 million tonnes, and whole sectors showing comfortable margins between their recent emissions and what they have been allocated, points to an inherent flaw in the system.
I guess we just have to wait and see what other reactions will be and be ready to defend ourselves.
(continues)
And things are falling in to place, fingers crossed. Today saw the arrival of a new animation on the home page. The result of lots of hard work by Michael Goldrei our star animator who worked round the clock to make it happen.
Lots of people have fed back that it wasn´t immediately obvious to the casual observer what we were all about so hopefully this new addition helps correct that, though more feedback always welcome!
(continues)

So much will be written, has already been written, about this historic US election that it seems pointless to add to the cacophony, but there really is nothing else that warrants writing about right now. The EU carbon price may be elegantly swan-diving and the reasons are interesting, but if there is one thing that will positively affect the future of the global carbon market it’s tonight’s result.
If the US elects Obama and we witness the dawn a new era in international relations in the US then the chances of working out a new climate deal are substantially improved. But, as with the last one, with regard to the nature of that deal what the US wants it will almost certainly get – such is the importance that everyone – Europe, China, India, Africa - places on getting them back in the game. Not only because they are such a huge source of emissions but also because the US has such a fantastic track record in incubating and commercialising new technologies.