The Eternal Surplus of the Spineless Market

Tweet

posted by Dave on 12th Mar 2015

New analysis from Sandbag shows that even with a strong Market Stability Reserve (MSR), the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) surplus will stay at about two billion tonnes until 2020. This will mean, contrary to some other analysts predictions, a tonne of carbon pollution in the EU will remain cheaper than a cinema ticket for the foreseeable future.

The carbon price is currently depressed by the vast surplus of pollution allowances. Sandbag’s analysis shows that whilst the ETS reform proposals as approved by the Environment (ENVI) Committee last month should prevent the carbon price falling further, the reforms are unlikely to lead to the increases forecast by some analysts.

This different projection mainly rests on a different prediction of the future of electricity consumption. Sandbag estimate electricity consumption will fall by 10% through this decade. Yet, against the continuing fall in real electricity consumption to date, most other analysts have failed to update their forecasts, and continue to assume stagnant or slightly increasing electricity consumption.

Last year, EU electricity consumption fell by an estimated 2.7%, and since 2010 consumption has fallen by 5%. (see graph)

2014 EU energy consumption

Dave Jones, Carbon & Power Analyst at Sandbag, commented: “New evidence on lower electricity consumption and lower hedging reconfirms our previous forecast. Even with a strong, early MSR, our surplus is forecast to stay at 2bt at 2020. The carbon price has actually fallen from €7.80 to around €6.60 since the ENVI vote, despite most analysts forecasting the price will rise. Policy-makers should not be timid about bringing in the MSR as early and as strong as possible: as it stands the carbon price is very unlikely to become expensive.”

Name:

Email address (will not be displayed on our website but we might want to contact you):

Comment:

:

d_le_nen on 26th Apr 2015:
In this piece, the main line of argumentation is the low carbon emission price. High emission price tags are depicted as a goal in their own right. I am somewhat critical to this approach. In my view, it would be better and more stringent to stick to the maximum tolerable emissions and put those forward as the main criterion whether EU policies fail or not. If emissions could be kept low enough with low carbon prices – fine with me. The low carbon price should indeed be pilloried, but always in the context of reaching or not reaching the maximum tolerable emissions goal.

Subscribe to Sandbag’s RSS feed