Solving the coal puzzle

Lessons from four years of coal phase-out policy in Europe

Playing With Fire

An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations

The A-B-C of BCAs

An overview of the issues around introducing Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU

Coal mine methane leaks are worse for climate change than all shipping and aviation

New IEA World Energy Outlook shows coal mine methane leaks add up to a third to emissions from coal

Coal Free Kingdom

UK election manifestos should commit to take the UK fully coal-free, including in industry, finance, and domestic heating – ready for next year’s COP26 in Glasgow

The cash cow has stopped giving: Are Germany’s lignite plants now worthless?

Our new research finds German lignite gross profits collapsed 54% so far in 2019. With lignite now loss-making, the case for Gov. compensation has collapsed

Proposal to introduce tax incentives for voluntary cancellation of permits

The UK is now liable to meet legally enforceable carbon budgets.

To account for the fact that ~50% of emissions of CO2 are covered by the EU ETS Government has chosen to count traded effort towards the meeting of these budget (as opposed to counting actual emissions). This is supported by the argument that emissions reductions are valid contributions to countering global climate change irrespective of where they occur and that trading helps to minimise cost by uncovering least cost abatement.

It is the initial allocation of permits that therefore contributes towards the budget. That is to say purchased permits/credits can be used to counteract or ‘offset’ any emission occurring above the initial allocation. Similarly any under emission resulting in sold or banked permits cannot be counted towards the budget (since they result in emissions occurring somewhere else).

Skills

Posted on

March 4, 2009