Solving the coal puzzle

Lessons from four years of coal phase-out policy in Europe

Playing With Fire

An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations

The A-B-C of BCAs

An overview of the issues around introducing Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU

Coal mine methane leaks are worse for climate change than all shipping and aviation

New IEA World Energy Outlook shows coal mine methane leaks add up to a third to emissions from coal

Coal Free Kingdom

UK election manifestos should commit to take the UK fully coal-free, including in industry, finance, and domestic heating – ready for next year’s COP26 in Glasgow

The cash cow has stopped giving: Are Germany’s lignite plants now worthless?

Our new research finds German lignite gross profits collapsed 54% so far in 2019. With lignite now loss-making, the case for Gov. compensation has collapsed

Decoding the deal – Explaining the Council agreement on the Market Stability Reserve

Decoding the deal – Explaining the Council agreement on the Market Stability Reserve

The deal struck by the Council in Coreper agreed a January 2019 start to the market stability reserve and the placement of both unallocated allowances and backloaded allowances into the MSR.

In order to break the blocking minority on start date led by Poland, wealthier Member States had to agree to shield a volume of nearly 1.5 billion allowances that would benefit poorer ones. However, despite this substantial volume, the actual transfer of wealth between wealthier and poorer Member States could be as low as 14 million EUAs – although the actual figure may shoot up to 260 million EUAs depending on how the surplus actually develops.

In this briefing, Sandbag provides a step by step overview of what allowance clusters are shielded, how the redistribution effects operate, and how gains and losses are distributed across groups of Member States.
Press clippings:
Skills

Posted on

May 1, 2015