Solving the coal puzzle

Lessons from four years of coal phase-out policy in Europe

Playing With Fire

An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations

The A-B-C of BCAs

An overview of the issues around introducing Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU

Coal mine methane leaks are worse for climate change than all shipping and aviation

New IEA World Energy Outlook shows coal mine methane leaks add up to a third to emissions from coal

Coal Free Kingdom

UK election manifestos should commit to take the UK fully coal-free, including in industry, finance, and domestic heating – ready for next year’s COP26 in Glasgow

The cash cow has stopped giving: Are Germany’s lignite plants now worthless?

Our new research finds German lignite gross profits collapsed 54% so far in 2019. With lignite now loss-making, the case for Gov. compensation has collapsed

Comparing options for ETS reform

,

Sandbag has examined various options for adjusting the supply of allowances in Phase 4 of the EU ETS. Our analysis reveals that rebasing the cap to reflect the actual level of emissions at the end of Phase 3 is by far the most effective way of creating a more appropriate supply demand balance.

Increasing the linear reduction factor and reform of the MSR also have beneficial effects. These are not enough on their own, but can complement rebasing of the cap.

Skills

Posted on

November 26, 2016