Solving the coal puzzle

Lessons from four years of coal phase-out policy in Europe

Playing With Fire

An assessment of company plans to burn biomass in EU coal power stations

The A-B-C of BCAs

An overview of the issues around introducing Border Carbon Adjustments in the EU

Coal mine methane leaks are worse for climate change than all shipping and aviation

New IEA World Energy Outlook shows coal mine methane leaks add up to a third to emissions from coal

Coal Free Kingdom

UK election manifestos should commit to take the UK fully coal-free, including in industry, finance, and domestic heating – ready for next year’s COP26 in Glasgow

The cash cow has stopped giving: Are Germany’s lignite plants now worthless?

Our new research finds German lignite gross profits collapsed 54% so far in 2019. With lignite now loss-making, the case for Gov. compensation has collapsed

The Cement Industry of the Future

, ,
The Cement Industry of the Future

31 January 2017

As the EU debates whether to raise border tariffs on cement, new research shows that a border adjustment mechanism would offer better incentives to cut cement emissions than the current EU ETS free allocation, whilst rewarding companies that produce low-carbon cement.

In mid-February, the full European Parliament will vote on whether to adopt a new border adjustment mechanism (BAM) proposed by the Parliament’s Environment Committee. A BAM would essentially require importers of cement and clinker into the EU to surrender emissions permits corresponding to the embedded carbon in their products – just as domestic EU cement manufacturers are required to do at present. At the same time, cement (along with other sectors that have low trade intensity and are also covered by the BAM), would no longer receive free allocation with BAM acting to prevent carbon leakage.

Read the full report: The Cement Industry of the Future

Skills

, , ,

Posted on

January 31, 2017